For nearly a year after Elon Musk’s takeover and rebrand to X, a steady stream of top advertisers fled the platform, spooked by surging hate speech and Musk’s own combative posts. Now, the pendulum is swinging the other way — some global CEOs are quietly returning, while others are abandoning the network for good. The reasons reveal a deep split in how corporate leaders weigh risk, reach, and personal reputation in a volatile media environment.

The initial exodus was dramatic. Brands including Disney, Apple, IBM, and Comcast paused spending after Musk endorsed an antisemitic conspiracy theory and a liberal watchdog group documented ads appearing beside extremist content. Platform data showed U.S. ad revenue dropping 55% year-over-year by late 2023. Many CEOs closed their own accounts, citing brand safety and “values misalignment.” One French luxury executive described X as “a toxic cocktail I no longer want my name associated with,” while a CAC40 bank chief called it “a professional reputational hazard.”

But Musk’s defiant “go f— yourself” message at the DealBook Summit in November 2023 paradoxically marked a turning point. The outburst, coupled with a private apology tour by CEO Linda Yaccarino, galvanized internal efforts to rebuild advertiser trust. X rolled out enhanced brand safety controls through partnerships with Integral Ad Science and DoubleVerify, introduced sensitive content filtering, and began publishing monthly transparency reports. Yaccarino told industry gatherings that 90% of the top 100 advertisers had returned by early 2024 — a claim that independent analysts dispute, but which reflects a material recovery.

For the returning CEOs, the calculus is pragmatic. “Our audience, especially the financial press and policymakers, still lives on X,” said the head of a multinational industrial firm. “Not being there means ceding the conversation.” A recent Maddyness–OpinionWay survey of 200 French executives found that 38% consider X essential for corporate communications, up from 29% in 2022. Many cite its unrivaled real-time news role during crises like the Ukraine invasion, where X served as a primary information conduit.

Yet departures continue. Two weeks ago, the chief executive of a major European tech company deleted his X account, telling colleagues the time investment no longer justified the “modest engagement and growing hate.” Another prominent pharmaceutical CEO described a “moral discomfort” that outweighed any PR benefit. These cases reveal a generational and sectoral fault line: older, B2B-focused leaders tend to see X as an indispensable “global watercooler,” while consumer-facing CEOs who are personally active on Instagram or LinkedIn increasingly question whether the platform’s toxic underbelly damages their brand more than the audience helps it.

The implications for X’s business are profound. While blue-chip advertisers may be trickling back, they are spending a fraction of previous budgets and demanding steep discounts. Yaccarino’s turnaround strategy hinges on maintaining CEO trust — a fragile proposition given Musk’s unpredictability. For every chief executive who now describes X as “the most important platform for my voice,” another has relegated it to a crisis-only tool. As the platform heads into a pivotal U.S. election cycle, which historically boosts political ad spending, its ability to retain high-level executive engagement will test whether the recent returns signal a lasting shift or a brief, pragmatic détente.

L’article Pourquoi les grands patrons reviennent ou débarquent sur X est apparu en premier sur Maddyness - Le média pour comprendre l'économie de demain.